The Androids Of Tara
(Season 16, Dr 4 with Romana I, 25/11/1978-16/12/1978, producer: Graham Williams, script editor: Anthony Read, writer: David Fisher, director: Michael Hayes)
'Ah! But a Taran Wood Beast cannot be held to write down in cold blood the wild and black thoughts that storm it’s brain when an uncontrolled passion has battered a breach for them. Yet, unless he sets himself up as a saint, he need not hate himself for them. He is better employed, as it humbly seems to me, in scaring time-travelling maidens so that they run into the arms of Count Grendel and fretting over his wicked impulses, extorting unwilling hospitality from the weakness of his nature. In other words: Roaaaaaar!’
Rupert, Woodbeast of Hentzau
In an emoji: ⚔
Ranking: 226
‘Androids Of Tara’ then. Or ‘The Romana In The Iron Mask’ as they might have called it with just a few tweaks. Well swash my buckles! If you’re the sort of viewer who loves plots involving android doubles and swordfights in a great big ol’ castle then this is the story for you! For what it is, it’s an impressive 100 minutes of everything you’d expect from that description done with aplomb: boo-hiss villains, exotic location filming, Tom Baker getting a rare chance to be a dashing hero rather than a lovable eccentric and a plot that nips along at high speed if you don’t think about it too much. Everything looks exquisitely lush (with some of the best location filming of the era), the performances are all solid, some of the lines especially witty. It’s hard to find fault with something this entertaining and nothing that important goes wrong, which in itself makes a nice change for a story in the Graham Williams era, which was beset by problems more than most. At the same time though it’s just one of those Dr Who stories that’s not for me, my buckle having never swashed and being so bored by android replica stories in scifi in general that I’m considering building an android double to watch them all for me and report back so I don’t have to see them myself. So soon after ‘The Pirate Planet’ this feels like a step back to the Dr Who dark ages, a story that doesn’t go wrong mostly because it plays things so safe everyone can achieve this sort of thing in their sleep. From the moment five minutes in when Romana happens to bump into the baddy (who seems so charming he can’t possibly be that nice) and a couple of minutes later when the Doctor happens to bump into the goody (surrounded by such pro-active guards that he can’t possibly be that nasty and inspire such confidence) you know where this story is going to go, doubly so if you know the source material ‘The Prisoner Of Zenda’ (the working title for David Fisher’s story was as unimaginative as Dr Who names comes: it was literally called ‘The Prisoner Of Zend’ and set on a planet called ‘Zend’, before script editor Anthony Read thought he’d better add at least some imagination). Weirdly the two big unexpected twists – that we’re in a civilisation from the future not the past, despite the Medieval trappings and that there are androids afoot – are revelations casually tossed aside in the middle of part one. There’s a decided feel of ‘everyone knows what to expect anyway so we might as well give it to them straight out’ this week. For once the extraordinary world of Dr Who comes over as a little too ordinary, without the series’ customary imagination to spice things up.
Nevertheless, just because it’s not
high on my list and doesn’t have the twists and turns of this series at its
best that doesn’t make this a bad story. With a show that’s this varied and run
for this long there are always going to be stories made for factions of the
fanbase who aren’t me. I still get to enjoy the lovely location filming in
Leeds Castle and the Doctor crossing swords and indeed crossing words with a
human antagonist who is for once pretty much his equal (Peter Jeffrey’s Count
Grendel somehow manages to stay just the right side of Pantomime Dame despite
being larger than life – or larger than a Taran Woodbeast anyway). Everyone
does the most they can within the format, from the actors (Romana effectively
plays four parts here, including android doubles – Mary Tamm jokes on the DVD commentary
she should have asked for four pay-packets) to the set designers (this really
feels like a castle even when it’s a TV studio set, as if it’s all shot on
location) to the script (which has some classic lines, most of them added by
Tom Baker and Mary Tamm), everyone rattling off the clichés with such aplomb
they still somehow feel fresh and new.
Even so, it blatantly isn’t. The 4th
Doctor era is chock full of stories that take a particular source material and do
something ‘Dr Whoy’ with it. The mixture varies, but it’s generally somewhere
around 50:50 what’s recycled and what’s new. In the case of ‘Androids Of Tara’
the lifting is slightly lazier, so it’s nearer 90:10 source material to Dr Who
stuff. Anthony Hope’s original is a heavy, rather dull read livened up by occasional
bursts of action and with some good lines, the best of which is ‘Fate
doesn’t always make the right men Kings’. You
can say much the same about ‘Tara’, a story that contains practically everything
you see in ‘Zenda’ (all the plot beats of impersonations and poisonings and
kidnappings and doppelgangers) that’s a bit ploddy and repetitive, livened up
by the action sequences and a couple of laugh out loud moments – the only things added are the ‘Key To Time’ bits
(which Romana gets out the way a few minutes in this week) and the fact that at
least two of these characters are really androids. The film version of the book
even starts with an eccentric English gentlemen who turns out to be the hero
fishing in a local stream, which explains why at the start the 4th
Doctor suddenly takes up an uncharacteristic interest in the sport and abandons
Romana to take the day off, never to show the slightest bit of interest again
for a couple of regenerations.
To be fair to the writer there’s a
good reason for all of this. Until the last minute this slot was meant to be
filled by a story, based around the same booked location shoot, about the
Doctor and Romana meeting an ‘evil’ variation of Robin Hood (some thirty-five
years before a similar idea in the 12th Doctor story ‘Robots Of
Sherwood’, this story’s closest cousin in modern Who for all sorts of reasons and
similarly mixed), script editor Anthony Read coming up with the idea that myths
and legends were the way to go, material that everyone recognised but which
still gave him wriggle room to surprise the audience by not having to fit
historical stories to a set timeline of events. Author Ted Lewis was hired to
write it and he was quite a feather in the cap for the series at the time: he
was a ‘serious’ writer, whose second novel ‘Jack’s Return Home’ (the source
material for the film ‘Get Carter’ about gang-members trying to become
respectable) made a big stir in the 1960s. Only, unbeknown to everyone in the
Who production office at the time, the reason thatLlewis took the commission
was that his life was falling apart and he needed the money in a hurry: he was
on the verge of splitting with his wife and had just been diagnosed with a
terminal illness, hitting the booze to cope with his problems. There are tales
that he turned up to a ‘let’s see how you’re getting on now you should have
finished the first draft’ tone meeting blind drunk, admitted that he’d not done
much at all and was sent home – even if, as you suspect, it’s one of those
tales that’s been exaggerated with every re-telling (and there’s a lot of that
in this series, with so many fanzines looking for juicy stories from production
team members pleased at the extra pay cheques) it must have been bad for an era
of Dr Who filled with such heavy drinkers as producer Graham Williams and
writer Douglas Adams to have seen his drinking as a problem worth dropping him
over, rather than being patient. Fisher was hired at the last minute and asked
to come up with a replacement story on the same lines using the already-booked
location. It seems odd that he wasn’t just hired to write the same story, about
an evil Robin Hood, but maybe Read thought that Lewis might get his act
together to write that one in the future (sadly he never did, dying in 1982) or
maybe he was just superstitious about the idea now it had fallen apart. Given
the brief time and the strict brief, Fisher actually does really well – and
given the speed you can forgive him for borrowing so heavily from existing
literature. It’s easy to imagine him getting the panicked phone call (he’d only
just finished work on ‘Stones Of Blood’ after all, being one of only the
writers in the ‘classic era of Who to compose back-to-back stories) and looking
round his library for a book with a plot he could re-hash quickly and directly.
That’s fitting really because
superstitions and customs are what ‘Androids Of Tara’ are all about. This is a
world that’s based around sixteen astrological signs and has sixteen hour days,
one for each sign. Things happen by routine and tradition here, based around the
stars and constellations, such as who gets to be monarch at any one particular
time. There’s a good reason for this that sadly the script only touches on
lightly: plague wiped out 9/10ths of the population (with androids built to
fill out the workforce as needed): at times like this all the science and logic
in the world won’t stop survivor’s guilt and wondering why you were spared and
not your ancestors’ nearest and dearest, so people look for signs everywhere,
something Count Grendel is relying on in his quest for power. The key to time
segment that Romana finds so quickly is hidden as a statue of a lion-like
animal that Count Grendel says is a sort of family mascot, with a legend
attached to it that danger will befall his family if something happens to it
(such as, say, it disappearing altogether and transforming into a supernatural
crystal). We at home know differently of course: its easy to see why a story
about one of the six segments of time meant to protect the universe and
disguised by an immortal being with special powers would have grown, down the
years, to the point where all sorts of legends have grown up around it. And as
ever in Dr Who those myths and superstitions turn out to be true – it’s
probably not much of a spoiler (but I’ll throw one in anyway) to say that the
Doctor defeats Count Grendel in the end so the superstitions all come true. It
seems that odd Count Grendel himself should mention this to Romana (and us)
though, given that he’s the only person on Tara who doesn’t seem to be
superstitious: instead he’s a pro-active schemer who thinks he can defy fate,
going to such lengths as kidnapping the Taran Royal Princess Strella. Wouldn’t you know it – she turns out to be
Romana’s exact double (it’s funny just how often that happens to timelords;
given what we now know about Gallifreyans having the ability to sub-consciously
shape the face they grow into, something that wasn’t a tradition yet in 1978
when this story was made, it’s somehow fitting that Romana of all people
subconsciously based herself on a princess she might have read about somewhere:
she has that kind of upper class caste vibe. Indeed its hard to imagine this
story working as well with any other companion as she’s the only one who would
naturally mix with Royalty, especially in her first regeneration – I mean, just
imagine this story with, say, Ace or Bill in the Tardis). Grendel’s plan is to
put his own specially programmed version of Strella onto the throne, marrying
her and thus inheriting the right to rule the planet with all the riches and privileges
that come with it. The only person who can stop him is the man who is betrothed
to her, Prince Reynart, whose holed up with the Doctor (who helps make him his
own android double) and who Grendel is desperate to kidnap too.
Tara is, like many a medieval
setting in Dr Who, something of a mixture. We never truly find out where in
space this planet is or what the date is, but it’s generally accepted by all
concerned that we’re somewhere in our future. Like ‘The Ribos Operation’ three
stories earlier it looks old-fashioned to us (and indeed viewers of the 1970s),
full of such anachronisms as Royalty, castles and a deeply ingrained class system
(it’s a general rule in Who that the more civilised a planet is the more equal
the hierarchy is). At the same time though this is an actually quite rare
species that have actually mastered the art of making robot replicas, ones so
accurate down to the last detail that they can walk and talk and even their
chief creator assumes Romana is an android having a malfunction rather than a
time-travelling body double (despite what she says). It’s a neat twist that a
companion is saved this week precisely because she sprains her ankle escaping a
monster (the swelling proving that she really is flesh after all). The weaponry
on this planet might look old-fashioned, with its cross-bolts and bows and
fencing swords, but these are weapons laced through with electrical currents.
What we have here then is a society that once had immense technological powers
but which has fallen into disarray for unknown reasons, either collapsing or
rejecting the idea of progress to go back to the good ol’ days. Everyone always
quotes ‘Star Wars’ as an influence for this story (as lightsabers are just
Medieval swords with a funky sound effect) but I think a bigger impact is the
Von Danikan books ‘Chariots Of the Gods’ and its many many squeals, the very Dr
Who sense that we ourselves once had great civilisations from ancient times
that crumbled into dust and left only a word of mouth legend of their
existence. Honestly, it would be keeping with this stage of the series if this
planet turned out to be Earth in the future (but it doesn’t, for a change). In
a series that’s all about time being a constantly shifting force, with the
Tardis darting about seeing the ripples and causes of one era impacting another,
it’s a neat idea to go full circle and a planet whose future looks just like
our past.
One neat detail you don’t often get
in stories like these is that it’s the peasants who understand all the
technology, which has become just another art form practised alongside the
Blacksmiths and Tailors in the town. The aristocracy haven’t got the first clue
how it works: they only care that it does. Generally speaking, in Dr Who
technology is hoarded by the people in charge so the everyday workers are kept
under tight control; it’s a neat twist on the usual formula to add that detail.
Even having Royalty is quite unusual for this series (as it happens we’ll have
yet another princess in a couple of stories’ time – and wouldn’t you know it,
she looks like the ‘other’ Romana! – but the only other ones in Who are in
stories definitively set in the past). I like the idea of an android replacing
a Royal. It would be easy. All they’d have to do is be programmed to wave and
ask ‘what do you do?’ every few minutes. King Charles (oh that still feels
funny to type even a year on from his, sadly much duller coronation than the one
on Tara) acts like a malfunctioning android now. Would that we had this lot
instead: Prince Reynart is my favourite of the handful of royals in Dr Who.
He’s willing to put himself in danger for others, looks out for his men and
most of all is unusually humble. Despite being a Prince he’s genuinely worried
about being worthy enough of Princess Strella as a man, beyond his powers as a
Prince. This is no nepo baby but someone who takes his inherited power very
seriously and worries too about what sort of King he’d become (which is how you
tell a good ruler in Dr Who: the more confident they are about how brilliant
they are, the more useless they tend to be). I reckon his King’s Christmas
messages every year (and Tara is so close to Earth I bet they have Christmases,
with chocolate wood beast replicas opened in front of a roaring electronic fire
and a benevolent white bearded robot animal named ‘Sandy Claws’ who delivers
gifts to all the Tarans who’ve been good) would be really uplifting and
comforting. Even when chained up and half-starved the Prince still has more
moral backbone than any of our Royals (Count Grendel, of course, would so have
an alibi from Tara Pizza Express to cover himself at a time when he was
actually working on an android in secret and locking the Princess up in a
dungeon). I find it interesting how close the Prince is to the only other
candidate in Dr Who, Prince Peladon, who is also new to the throne and a little
wet behind the ears. Even more interestingly we never find out what happened to
either set of parents and both plots don’t revolve around it: given events here
it would totally make sense if Count Grendal had bumped off King or Queen
Reynard too, but if they do then we never hear about it and obody even
questions it.
There’s another source text that
often gets overlooked for this story (perhaps David Fisher found two books on
his shelf and couldn’t choose between them?) ‘Grendel’ is one of the (many)
baddies in ‘Beowulf’, the 10th century poem that’s one of the oldest
in the English language. A giant, the cursed descendent of Cain from the Bible,
he’s the ‘wicked Uncle’ who wouldn’t accept being a spare, not a heir (so in
modern times he’s a mixture of Prince Harry’s position and William’s scheming
personality). He’s not worthy of ruling though: he doesn’t love his people, he
loathes and detests them, particularly the happy singing that goes on in their
kingdom every night. So he attacks by stealth, kidnapping or killing the people
one by one to make them scared of him, because if he can’t rule through love
maybe he can de-throne his brother out of fear. Only there are too many people in
the kingdom so that even after twelve years of doing this night after night
there are still too many peasants around and he’s seen as a minor irritant rather
than a mass murderer. So Grendel loses his temper and goes on a giant massacre,
to make sure the people he thinks of as ‘his’ fear him –by which time he’s lost
their respect and ends up being rejected again, banished before being
killed. Unlike ‘Prisoner Of Zenda’, which
is a modern-ish Tale (1920s) set in Ye Olde Ancient Past this is a genuinely
old legend, told round campfires and spread and expanded on by word of mouth.
For all we know it may well be older than we know, a tale of something real
that happened in ancient times. Either way, ‘Androids Of Tara’ feels like a
morality play that’s been played out over time: every generation, every planet
has a Count Grendel who thinks they can thwart justice but they always get
found out in the end. There’s a sense of cathartic relief when the Doctor
defeats him (with a snazzy swordfight no less) and a very funny pay-off line
that Grendel, humiliated, having toppled from the castle into the moat, is
still spouting furious denials (‘next time I won’t be so lenient!’) unable to accept
that someone’s outsmarted him.
Another of the more interesting
aspects of this story is that it’s a rare Dr Who romance. There really aren’t
that many – take the long-running story arcs of the Doctor and Rose plus Amy
and Rory out the equation and all you’re really left with is ‘The Girl In The
Fireplace’ (and that’s a gonzo love story if ever there was one). There are
more snogs per screen minute in this story than any other classic Who story
(and no I haven’t counted them all, but let’s face it there aren’t many
competitors – even Jo and Cliff just swap hugs and pecks on the cheek) – it’s
not until David Tennant comes along, kissing people in more stories than not,
that this record gets thrashed. Prince Reynart and Princess Strella are a good
match: this might be an arranged marriage but they both stay loyal under
pressure and risk a lot to keep the other safe and there’s eefinite chemistry
between them, as if they’ve enjoyed a life together before we joined the story.
You sense the Kingdom of Tara is in good hands when the Doctor leaves (and yes
there is a debate over whether Tara is the kingdom or the planet given the
ambiguous way people refer to it; in my head it’s both: Tara is a planet with
just one great big land mass and both are named the same, because why would you
give a planet a different name if the land is all one thing anyway?) Honestly I
don’t know why we don’t get more romances in Dr Who as it’s something that
works really well: it adds a touch of humanity to the supporting cast that
makes you care for them, gives the plot an extra gear of jeopardy for reasons
(at least some) viewers can relate to and the idea of ordinary people doing
extraordinary things to be together is something that fits well with the Dr Who
elastic format. Oh and talking of romances, one of my favourite
behind-the-scenes stories concerns ‘Tara’: bored between filming, Mary Tamm got talking
to stuntman Terry Walsh about how he stayed so fit and Walsh mentioned his love
of martial arts, partoicularly aikido. He offered to show some moves to Mary and
was showing her a particularly close body position when Mary’s husband Marcus walked
in early, ready to pick her up, and naturally assumed they were embracing until
the mistake was unravelled. The only thing that would make that story funnier
is if he was dressed as the Taran Wood beast at the time!
That’s the real motivation for ‘Androids
Of Tara’: misunderstandings. This story would be cleared up a lot sooner if the
peasants could see through Grendel for who he is, but they’ve learnt to trust
in fate, not the truth of what’s before them. Everyone is too polite to say anything
to stop the events that nearly lead to their doom: it takes the Doctor’s
perspective, as an outsider, to see through
the customs and traditions that are restricting rather than liberating. This
all lends itself to a story that, despite being about a culture with scientific
knowhow, really feels more like a fairytale: this is a story about good people
out of their depth somehow coming good against evil scheming people with all
the power and knowledge. It’s not just the locals though; Romana too is a
little too trusting and naïve, booksmart instead of lifesmart (really, the
Doctor should know better than to leave her alone – of all the ‘Doctor and
companions get split up’ subplots this one happens particularly early). If
people are just going to take things on trust without thinking about them, the
plot says, they might as well be unthinking androids.
That’s a very Dr Who message and a
worthy idea for the show. The problem is it’s all a bit too Dr Who and even
more it’s a bit too ‘Medieval drama morality play’. It’s story aeguably closer to the source material
of ‘Prisoner Of Zenda’ than the BBC’s own 1984 adaptation (one written by former
Who script editor Terrance Dicks no less, which must have given him a real
sense of déjà vu given that he wrote the rather bland novelisation of ‘Tara’ just
four years earlier). It’s all very
watchable but oddly unsatisfying by the time you get to the end of it and
everything goes exactly the way you suspected once you saw through the twist of
this being in the future looking like the past (a twist that comes roughly five
minutes into a 100minute story). There are some lovely moments along the way:
seeing Tom Baker handle a sword is fun (and while it’s not as good as the fight
in ‘The Sea Devils when Jon Pertwee eats a sandwich while defeating The Master one-handed,
it beats the one in ‘The King’s Demons’ easily), some fun gags (Romana, having
never seen a horse before, assumes it’s another mechanical beast) and you get
the sense the cast are having a brilliant old time making it (especially Peeter
Jeffrey as Count Grendel, an actor once considered as the second Doctor before Patrick
Troughton said yes and so enthusiastic about the shoot he even did his own
stunts, jumping into the moat – but admittedly not from as great a height as
the camera makes out). Something about this story always lands flat though: the
pieces of the jigsaw are there and the acting and some of the dialogue and the
sets and scenery are first-rate: it’s just that this is such a simple jigsaw to
solve you’re left wanting more and you can’t help feeling that it should be
more fun to watch than it is.
Maybe it’s the script, which was certainly
rushed (with many of the lines reportedly changed by the cast during filming). Or
maybe it’s the direction (Michael Hayes looked down his nose at Dr Who and
wanted to be known for making ‘serious drama’ – he agreed to do this partly as
a favour to family friend Who producer Graham Williams who’d been nagging him
for ages and to please his fourteen year old son Patrick who was a guest on
location and even got to rustle the bushes as a stand in for the Woodbeast in
episode one, but you can tell dad would rather be elsewhere; it seems odd that
of all the ‘Key To Time’ scripts the most overtly ‘fun’ and childish one was
given to a director who already considered Dr Who childish). Or maybe this is
just one of those stories that was never meant to soar in this format. Ultimately
the biggest problem is simply that ‘Androids Of Tara’ feels like a very minor
tale indeed, dispensing with the series arc of the key to time within the
opening minutes and being a mixture of at least three very obvious Dr Who
plots: robot doubles, people getting captured and recued and having tyrants overthrown
due to their own stupidity and negligence. It just never quite connects, as if
its part android itself, a clever replica of another tale rather than the real
thing.
POSITIVES + The story was filmed
on the lush grounds of the very lovely Leeds Castle. Which, despite what some
guide books might accidentally tell you, is nowhere near Leeds (it’s in Kent,
so much nearer to BBC TV centre). A 9th century genuine Saxon manor (with
additions made in the 13th century), it really looks the part and
has been used in all sorts of films down the decades. Dr Who nearly lost it
too: the Castle became the unlikely scene of a frantic two-week peace
conference held about the war in the Middle East (some things never change eh?
Talk about history repeating itself…We’re probably under the same Taran star
sign we were in 1978 again in 2023), held between American, Israeli and
Egyptian dignitaries (it’s fun to imagine Henry Kissenger walking down the
exact same steps Tom Baker swordfights peter Jeffreys on just a couple of days
earlier, although that’s a very different kind of a story). There was a danger the
talks might have over-run and the show cancelled; in the end the biggest casualty
was the matte paintings used to depict the castle: the poor artist planned to
drop into the grounds and paint it leisurely over two weeks before filming but
he was barred entry due to the extra security and ended up having most of a
single morning instead. Considering that, it’s not a bad effort at all, only
looking fake when the camera shoots it from the ‘wrong’ angle.
NEGATIVES – The Taran Wood Beast
is notorious in Dr Who fan circles, despite only having around two minutes of
screen time (and to be honest he might as well not be there: the plot just needs
Romana to be scared enough to run off towards Count Grendel; a sound effect
would have done). A sort of Ewok with teeth crossed with a teddy bear, it seems
very much the afterthought of a production team who thought 'oops, forgot to
put a monster in for the kiddywinkles, lets have a rummage round the back of
the cupboard on the morning of filming and then get it out the way'. As it
happens, they’d booked a bear costume already from BBC stock but hadn’t
bothered to look at it and found to their horror that it was moth-eaten and in
disrepair and had to be hastily patched up, with a new mask fitted at the last
minute. Unlike some Dr Who costume disasters that inspire last gasp moments of
genius, this one looks just like a damaged costume improvised at the last
minute and the Wood Beast is one of the few Dr Who ‘monsters’ that’s never been
turned into a toy (amazingly there is a figurine, added to the long running
model collection but not till as late as 2022). Even so, if they ever make a
cuddly toy version of it I’m first in the queue. I think I’ll name mine ‘Taran
the Toothy’.
BEST QUOTE: One of my favourites,
The Doctor’s ‘Do you mind not standing on my chest? My hat’s on fire’,
something I use in everyday life more often that you might suppose.
No comments:
Post a Comment