Showing posts with label Season 2 (20th Century). Show all posts
Showing posts with label Season 2 (20th Century). Show all posts

Wednesday, 22 November 2023

The Space Museum: Ranking - 1

 

The Space Museum

(Season 2, Dr 1 with Ian Barbara and Vicki, 24/4/1965-15/5/1965, producer: Verity Lambert, script editor: Dennis Spooner, writer: Glyn Jones, director: Mervyn Pinfield)

Rank: 1

   'Welcome to the Dr Who Museum. It's not like other museums. For a start, its a lot bigger on the inside. For another you can visit it at any part in its time stream and the same exhibits will always be there, in past present or future, from all possible timelines. And for another history is a real life living thing just a Tardis landing an a set of doors away, where everything you see can change in a nano-second. Cost: a twenty nog note or Asteroid Express. Time tots must be accompanied by an older regeneration. Tin robot dogs to be kept on a lead at all times, unless in the event of a revolution'. 






Well we made it everyone, congratulations – the 315th and final review! In that time we’ve gone back to the distant past and forward to the far future and found both of them parables for the present day, defeated endless power-hungry aliens who thought humans would be easy prey, tutted while mankind fell into the exact same traps, witnessed clever intricate plots that ask big intellectual questions, been on huge character arcs that have put our characters through the emotional wringer, asked big questions about karma, fate, pre-destiny, rebellion, generation gaps and asked what it means to be human in a universe that’s so often inhumane in a series that’s also seen the Dr fancy Kylie Minogue on an intergalactic Titanic, dodge a pantomime Myrka horse on a base underground and seen Yartek The Alien Voord trip over his own flippers. In between a handful of the dumb scifi stories (and even a handful of dumb historical ones) DW has asked bigger, bolder, deeper, more probing questions than any programme I can think of, teaching us lessons from the past offering us hope for the future and holding up a mirror to our present, all with a variety that no other series could even begin to match. Yes, all those reviews in space and time end up here. And where is our final destination after 315 days and sixty years of travelling in space and time? Future or past? The future! But a future that’s filled with the past. For we’re in a space museum, an exhibition in the far future that the Tardis is so excited to get to that it arrives a whole episode early, leaving its crew as phantoms who discover that they are an exhibit themselves. A lot of fans are probably flabbergasted that this tale by one-off DW writer Glynn Jones is my favourite story – its far from the most popular or the most obvious. Most probably can’t even remember it. Those that do seem to talk about how boring it is and how it goes downhill after a strong beginning. There is, admittedly a lot of talking, but that’s alright when the dialogue is this good and the low points are more than off-set by the brilliant and daring first episode quite unlike anything ever seen in the series before or since and a finale that ends with nothing short of an armed revolution. I put it to you too, dear reader, that no other DW story (and therefore no other bit of television) asks as many questions as this story or comes up with as many fascinating answers, all of which I’m going to have great fun getting into (this bumper review ended up super long, sorry, but then its my favourite story and on this site– it was never going to be short was it?!?) Firstly, however, before the bigger picture, some of the details. The first episode is my favourite bit of telly by anyone – not just DW, of anything. It’s full of such mystery and intrigue, with the utterly brilliant idea that the Tardis has arrived too early for the usual story so the companions have a different one, trying to avoid the sad ending and a fate where they get captured, frozen and put on display, their adventures across space and time ending as exhibits for aliens to gawp at. The moment when they come face to face with themselves is one of the greatest, scariest moments in the series, perfectly sold by the main cast who are exemplary and one of the all-time great cliffhangers at the end of part one as they realise they’ve now ‘arrived’ and at any moment can do the wrong thing that puts them into those cases. There are also two of the funniest scenes in all of DW, as the Dr hides inside an empty Dalek casing, giving his best impression the way children were up and down the land and giggling, before leading the local baddies on a merry dance by holding up their interrogation with goofy answers to their questions (imagining a penny farthing when asked ‘how did you come here?’ and a swimsuit when asked what his companions are wearing). If the story goes downhill a little from episode two like some fans say, with a third episode that does a lot of procrastinating waiting for the Dr to wake up and William Hartnell to come back off holiday, well its still never less than superb, with a revolution to enjoy – and revolution, doing things differently to shake up staid archaic traditions, is exactly what this show is all about. One of the reasons I love it is that ‘The Space Museum’ is kind of an amalgam of all the other 314 stories, a parable about invasion and freedom that takes in colonialisation and appropriation, eccentric youthful rebellions against tired authoritarian regimes, generational angst, pre-determinism karma and fate, the concept of ghosts and phantoms and the ripples that all of our actions have on the people around us. Another is that, for the first time properly, we see the Dr and companions as a force for good, changing things for another culture because its the right thing to do rather than to save their own lives. On top there’s a delicious layer of postmodernism, with the Daleks – the most evil race in the universe – relegated to a dusty corner of the museum as a forgotten exhibit and with part of the story taking place on a television screen. I love it because it gives William Hartnell a chance to do the comedy he was born to play in between some of his greatest and most serious speeches, with strong parts for all the regulars. I love the way it goes back to making the Tardis an equal character, a thinking sentient being full of mysterious power that’s more than just a simple rocketship moving from A to Z. I love the mixture of drama and comedy in a script that’s only a lurch away from a big scary moment or a laugh out loud line. But most of all I love it because it’s so imaginative, so wildly different to anything else (not just in DW but in all of television) that plays around with time the way many of the best DW stories do but in a wholly original way.

I also love the setting. You would think that museums would be crucial to Dr Who. They are, after all, the closest that any of us sitting in the audience will ever come to living in another time-zone, with access to real life artefacts from the days gone by that teach us how our ancestors spent their days. Only in many ways DW is the antithesis of museums. Far from tidying history into neat little boxes with simple captions invariably written by the victors of a particular battle and gawped at by passing Moroks, in Dr Who all of the past, the present and the future exist as a living, breathing and all-round messy state of affairs, one long line on which cause and effects are dotted, all connected. For the Doctor and his Tardis all periods are potentially the present and above all alive, with the potential for change that will impact all the other time periods he sees. The past, the present and future are all the same to time travellers, jumbled together at the whim of the Tardis’ very random controls and even the most smug, proud civilisation is only another jumping off point in the past for those with a time machine. Where others record history as part of a closed sealed narrative the doctor lives it like an open book, experiencing events firsthand, seeing the complicated ripples of our history that have led us to where we are in the present day. A lot of DW, especially in the black and white days when it used to travel in the past more frequently, is about seeing history for what it was really like, without the glamour and bias of the history books, a time when the past was still the present and nobody quite knew how things would turn out yet. The fearsome Kublai Khan becomes a harmless old man playing backgammon, Saladin turns out to be more honourable than Richard the Lionheart, The Meddling Monk sells toasters to the Vikings and the Dr himself accidentally invents the Trojan horse in Ancient Greece. In a museum, though, the past is all sorted and settled, battles of antiquity that were real life and death decisions relegated to a fusty corner of a forgotten exhibit.

The idea of a museum is so very DW they’ve doe it again three times: Of the three other museums we’ve had in the modern series all of them view history as being slightly ‘wrong’ - ‘The Pandorica Opens’ turns an ancient artefact that’s been preserved under great duress for centuries into a present-day bit of flirting between the Dr and River Song, ‘Dalek’ has the 9th Dr running around a sort-of museum of alien artefacts as curated by a mad American whose only interested in weapons and doesn’t understand the first thing about what the objects are, as if his own culture is more important than all the things he’s ‘borrowed’ and ‘The Seeds Of Death’ took the cutting age technology of the year of transmission and put them in a far future when they’re obsolete, loved by historians not pioneers. In DW the times they are always a changin’ and future that are ignorant about the past and yet dismiss it as stupid are fair game, as are regimes so up themselves that they think they’re the be all of civilisation, not a future exhibit themselves. ‘The Space Museum’ still has the best comment for my money though: no one is immune to becoming exhibits, fixed points in the past, unless you actively adapt yourself to a changing world. In a series that’s primarily about change, what greater lesson could there be? And its one more pertinent than ever in an era of once venerated statues being overthrown and showrunners re-writing the past to fit modern changes in society.

In a series all about change and time travel museums are ‘wrong’ – even ones like the one on Xeros in the far future (when there’s less history to change). However, at least those museums celebrated some form of the past: in ‘The Space Museum’ the past has become irrelevant, the Moroks taking no pride in their collection and not exactly going out their way to get visitors (we don’t see any – maybe its an intergalactic Sunday?) This isn’t living, breathing history that feels ‘real’ the way ‘The Crusades’ did on Dr Who only the week before ‘The Space Museum’ aired; no, this is a messed up collection of forgotten nick-knacks stuck in a museum because they are too expensive to keep in a warehouse. There’s no love or regard for the past here, no understanding of what came before, no lessons learned in the present. The Moroks just take things that don’t belong to them as a sort of prize, all the great monsters of the past from Daleks down who also tried to conquer people and take away their freedoms turned into mere trophies, the Moroks who put them there not realising that one day too, they’ll be defeated in just the same way they are.


The idea of the Tardis crew ending up in a museum (alongside a Dalek and many props used in the series) is also a very funny joke. Back in 1965 the thought that one day people might enjoy Dr Who the series with nostalgia, to share it with children and grandchildren and great-grandchildren who hadn’t been born on the date of first transmission or to own it on nice shiny discs with extras featuring ageing cast and crew reminiscing would seem more outlandishly science-fiction than any Dalek invasion or time machine. Heck, in this period in time you didn’t ever get to see a Dr Who episode if you happened to miss it, thanks to the complicated way that the BBC drew up their contracts, with repeat fees a complicated affair that involved contacting everyone involved all over again for permission. Television was the most transient, temporary media going in 1965, treated more like stage plays once seen always lost rather than film to be kept and treasured. If you missed it, that was it – the idea that you could go back and re-visit something as transient as items from a television programme, on the same level as great moments in history, was meant to be funny. While in practice it was just an excuse for raiding the props cupboard and getting the episode in on budget, there’s also something triumphant in the idea of a ‘space museum’ that clearly covers many of the worlds that have already been seen in Dr Who, as if at last these are all props worth keeping in storage because DW is likely to keep running for the foreseeable future. This is, after all, a series celebrating eighteen almost continuous months on the air with a still incredibly healthy average of somewhere around ten million viewers – largely unheard of back in 1965 for anything that wasn’t news, soap or sports based. Though the dialogue never mentions any of it, eagle-eyed viewers can spot the distinctive chairs used by ‘The Sensorites’, the laser used for a few things and most visibly later in ‘The Wheel In Space’ and of course the infamous Dalek casing. Notably there’s nothing here from Earth, which presumably wasn’t considered an important planet by this point in the future (either that or Sabalom Glitz had sold all the antiques already to some passing megalomaniac Earthling ex-pat nostalgic for home; my guess is Mavic Chen). Oddly, large swathes of past Tardis props and walls appear, though none of the four seem to notice (as the original Tardis interior seems a ‘standard’ model however perhaps various parts in this museum are in fact pinched from Gallifrey?) This is a real thrill for fans like me who have too much time on their hands and love seeing items from the show’s past again – it gives an extra layer that DW is ‘real’ somehow, that these adventures all take place in the same universe, a continuous tale that is still running without re-set button at the end of each adventure and when the TV cameras are no longer filming.


There is another darker aspect to this story too: back in 1965, far more than now, most museums here were records of the decaying British empire, full of items appropriated from other cultures much the same way the Moroks do in the story. By 1965 it was becoming increasingly obvious that Britain was no longer the super-power it once was, with an Empire that stretched across the globe the way The Daleks’ did on TV. There was a general divide in opinion on this past, depending on the age of the people you asked in 1965: to those who had grown up in Queen Victoria’s day the idea of owning another population was a good thing, for them as much as you; colonialists were the bringers of peace to barbaric nations, who gave them law and order and structure as well as taking away their freedom and increasing their amount of tax-paying subjects. To those of a younger age who’d grown up after WWII, though, when superpowers like America, Russia and China were competing for dominance on a cold war stage, it seemed wrong and blooming well frightening that another civilisation could invade yours and appropriate your culture, absorbing it into some bigger whole you didn’t approve of, taking your things for themselves. The fact that ‘The Space Museum’ has all the characters accepting the Xerons’ right to live in peace and overthrow their masters without a single comment (even from the Doctor, who at least looks the right age for being Victorian/Edwardian despite being a centuries’ old alien) is very telling I think and quite a revolutionary idea for 1965. Writer Glyn Jones had, after all, seen the effects of colonialism first-hand. He had been born in South Africa and worked in their National Theatre travelling the country putting on plays during apartheid, before deciding that his only was of making acting a career would be to hitch-hike to Europe, writing on the side to pay his way (he is, indeed, the only person to ever write and act in two separate Dr Who stories during the series’ original ‘classic era’ run; that’s him – funnily enough – being ‘colonised’ as Krans, one of the humans in ‘The Sontaron Experiment’ in 1974). Inevitably with his home accent Jones was forever getting typecast as exotic foreigners and no doubt getting increasingly annoyed at the fact that there weren’t many decent parts written for people who didn’t speak The Queen’s English. This led to him writing good roles for actors of foreign descent in many of his own works, including his most famous play ‘The ‘88’ about an uprising in India and the last execution of a British soldier (bad timing meant that a real uprising in Ireland rather overshadowed it’s opening night, though). In short, out of all the writers for 1960s Dr Who, if any of them were going to write a story sneakily getting in thoughts about the horrors of colonialism onto the TV, then it was probably going to be him. However, rather than make a serious point at a time when it might have been dangerous, here he makes it a comedy, the joke being on the Moroks (Jones has said that his original draft for the story included many more comedy moments but that these were taken out when Dennis Spooner took over as story-editor from David Whittaker, surprisingly so actually given the large amount of jokes in Spooner’s own scripts for the series).


The Moroks are depicted here as being ruthless colonisers on a par with the Daleks or Cybermen – indeed, what with a Dalek casing in their museum, the suggestion is that the Moroks themselves now rule Skaro with the Daleks and Thals extinct and as such are even worse than they are. However, they have ruled the universe for so long that they have become complacent, unsure what to do with the planets they conquered and hit by a sense of malaise. For, like many a baddy in Dr Who, what do they want to do with all this power once they own it and have put it away in a museum? They don’t know – because their own culture is so deadly dull they have to steal from someone else’s. For many colonial powers the difficult part wasn’t the invasion and enslaving of races (which generally happened by surprise and stealth) but staying in control of those colonies when the inhabitants decided to fight back on all sides with a hunger for the freedom of their own people conscripted soldiers in an often cold and wet foreign land could never match. It’s also probably not a coincidence on the writer’s part that the museum has been the size of a whole planet for at least this length of time. For after you have filled a museum that’s as big as it can be where do you go from there? You can’t have new exhibits to show off to people once you have collected everything. This sort of thing was also in the news a lot in the mid-1960s with the first stirrings of debate over the appropriation of the Elgin Marbles that dated back to the days of ‘The Myth Makers’ (the setting, not the DW story) and yet which had been sitting in The British Museum ever since a Victorian named Thomas Bruce (the 7th Earl of Elgin, hence the new name) appropriated them for his own house in 1812. They were part of his private collection; only his own debts and cash-flow problems led to their being seen by the public at all after Bruce sold them on to The British Museum. There was an outcry about this even at the time when Greece was under the control of The Ottoman Empire (Lord Byron called the idea ‘vandalism and looting’), with the Greek government asking many times for their return since their independence in the 1830s. The 1960s was one of these times they were asked after a document used in court to demonstrate the removal of the stone was finally translated into English but while it agreed to the removal of many minor pieces didn’t mention the Elgin Marbles by name or description so as not to cause a fuss ‘just in case’ of rtaliation in the present. The Moroks have clearly done the same with all the exhibits in the museum, cultural vandalism that might pale alongside enslaving a race and killing all those of age but is nevertheless a crime as heinous as any in the DW universe worthy of them being overthrown because in 1965 the idea of holding onto something that wasn’t yours just because you could was an anachronism,something your parents and grandparents did. In short, the Moroks don’t deserve their museum and you like to think the Xerons spent their time after the Tardis’ departure sending all the exhibits back to their proper place (you have to feel for the poor Xeron who had to go to Skaro to explain this though.Especially if they then had to get a Dalek to sign some paperwork for them).


The introduction of Governor Lobos in episode two is a gem of Dr Who humour: he isn’t your obvious idea of a cold-blooded killer keeping control through intimidation and power; he’s just an ambitious chap who clearly hasn’t thought about his job much and has left one boring role for another, clearly counting down the hours until he can go home and/or retire. He isn’t a ruthless killer who defeated all the foes in the museum, just a bureaucrat with a headache who wants a long lie-down and whose safest way out of all the headaches the Tardis foursome are giving him is to get rid of them as quickly as possible. He’s not the sign of an empire at its prideful healthy peak, but a sign of decay and decadence, of shortcuts to an easy life taken too far. At this moment in time Lobos would rather there wasn’t an empire to defend at all because it just means a lot of extra paperwork. He’s the start of a long line in DW of comedy baddies, following rules and being unable to see the bigger picture, a creature to be pitied rather than feared. No wonder the Doctor starts quoting from Gibbon’s ‘Decline and Fall of The Roman Empire’ later in the episode – Xeros is about at the point where the Romans withdrew from Britain after hundreds of years of rule more out of malaise than malice. As for the space museum itself, we are told it stretches across the whole planet and should be a thing of marvel; however visitors stopped coming to see the exhibits ‘hundreds of minims’ ago. That’s not a good sign for any civilization and suggests that its size and stature have been taken for granted, rather like The Romans in the Middle Ages, The British Empire in the Edwardian period or arguably America now. No one in living memory has had to strive for anything, they’re just the descendents of the people who did, going through the motions while the anger and injustice of the colonised builds up. All it takes, on a subjugated planet full of Xerons full of resentment and frustration, to kickstart a revolution is the right leader at the right time – which Vicki is.
The year 1965 is a particularly fascinating point in time, an era that would be my first choice in any museum. The middle year of the decade that’s arguably seen more societal change and upheaval than any other in living memory, it also happens to be exactly twenty years since the end of the Second World War. And the Second World War started exactly twenty years after the end of The First World War. For an entire generation, who’d grown up losing parents and grandparents, war seemed inevitable and something that was a part and parcel of being human. They had brought up their children with the knowledge that there had been two wars to end all wars already and that the end of the last one had brought deadlier weapons into play than ever before so the world might not live to see a fourth. When most people imagined the future in 1965 they probably came up with something similar to ‘The Dalek Invasion Of Earth’, a scarred broken world under military control, but without the happy ending. The idea that there even could be a museum containing artefacts that hadn’t even been created yet took a whole leap of faith that there was going to be a future at all. As we’ve seen in a few other 1960s stories DW was unique in having a family audience, to be enjoyed by mums and dads alongside their children and a rare platform where stories and the messages in them had to appeal to both sensibilities. All too often the series falls into the traps of dismissing youthful ideals as a load of arrant nonsense (‘The Dominators’ is particularly ‘wrong’, a story about how hippie idealism and pacifism is stupid and weirdly enough sides with shouty men in togas) but the most interesting stories are those that ask big questions about how both sides of the sofa can come together and find common ground. The story after this ‘The Chase’ is, I think, the pinnacle of this: in all of space and time Vicki most wants to see The Beatles sing their just-released single ‘Ticket To Ride’ and Ian and Barbara want to get back home to swinging London, to the point of risking their lives, because its the best place in the universe to be, while the Daleks are the ‘old’ war-like generation who haven’t noticed that the rules have changed. ‘The War Games’, too, ends the 1960s by pointing out how all wars feel the same across history and are all the fault of the (impossibly) old people who don’t have to fight in them anyway. That feeling is in this story too, though, but one that’s firmly on the side of the kids.


We’re not quite at the ‘summer of love’ yet but there’s definitely a feeling in the air in 1965 that the youth of the day won’t be like their parents when they come of age and that war is something adults do to each other while the children are giving out flowers and saving the planet. DW was, moreover, a youthful show made by an impressively young crew of people – producer Verity Lambert was not-quite-thirty by the time ‘The Space Museum’ was broadcast and writer Glyn Jones was only thirty-four. Compared to most programmes being made by The BBC it was very much being made by near-children partly for children, with new attitudes not seen anywhere else. When the Moroks took the planet over they deported or killed all of the adults, leaving only the youth as slaves, they treat them like children and assume they won’t put up any resistance because they’re too young, wet and inexperienced, without realising the powder-keg that’s waiting to be set off. Pacifism is seen as weak, something to be exploited, not a strength of character. Here, for the moment, they’re in stasis, a revolution on the cusp, unwilling to fight back – so the Moroks assume that’s that and go back to pushing paper around for a living. But these proto-hippies still talk about and whole heartedly believe in peace and are brave and committed and righteous, they just lack a strong leader to lead them on till Vicki turns up crying ‘viva le revolution!’ (it might be significant she comes from Liverpool and likes The Beatles), but underneath they’re angry enough to fight for their freedom as fiercely as any race we see in DW. By 1965 there was a growing feeling of fear amongst the adults of the day about what might happen when the teenagers of the day came of age and took over, of what long-standing institutions they might dismantle (even the word teenager was itself ‘new’ – till the 1950s people just went from being children to being younger clones of their parents, but teenager implies a whole subculture with its own rules and insider references). This was an era of teenagers speaking out against everything that came before that wasn’t working but adults were following blindly anyway: this is the era of ‘ban the bomb’, of draft dodging, of protests against wars in Vietnam and Korea and while the youngsters haven’t quite got it together enough to form into groups the way they will at ‘Monterey Pop’ and ‘Woodstock’ in a few years they’re already gathering at smaller music festivals without an adult or chaperone in sight. From the adult point of view all the liberties that had been so hard fought for, across two world wars and more, were going up in smoke, their countries sitting ducks for others to invade, perhaps not realising how after two generations most people in most countries didn’t have the stomach to fight. There was surely something in the air at the time too as this is basically the plot of ‘Logan’s Run’ here too, about the youth only having a certain amount of time to make society ‘theirs’ before they run out of time and become adults like the Moroks to be exterminated, only here the hint is that they’ll just end up standing around being grumpy, filling in paperwork and moaning about how much better it was in the olden days (how most children tend to see adults).That celebrated novel won’t be published until 1967 though, with ‘The Space Museum’ getting there first (notably the novel sets the age of execution at twenty-one which is pretty much what we see here, with Jeremy Bulloch for instance aged twenty; the film adaptation of 1969 moves this age of death up to thirty to accommodate more experienced actors and actresses). However, as much as this story is filled with 1960s revolutinary zeal, it also comes with a warning: that if the youth of the day make the ‘wrong’ change, if they give up on revolution they’ll just end up stuck in time like their parents, their achievements gathering dust in a future museum. Youth is a moving target with a limited time to have an impact before they grow up to become an adult institution. As Isaac Asimov once said ‘To your generation everything being created around you is completely normal and part of everyday life. Everything created the generation before you is a career opportunity. And everything created two generations after you is the work of the devil and should be abolished!’ Every generation goes through it and even the 1960s aren’t immune. And so it proved to be: I mean who in 1965 would have guessed at a Beatles ‘comeback’ single being released in DW’s 60th anniversary being so awfully generic and for the money not the music? This is the band who’ve just released ‘Ticket To Ride’ and at the peak of their powers.
There is no other way out of the museum except revolution. Just watch what happens with the plot after all when every other way except Vicki’s comes unstuck: The Doctor tries to do his normal thing in situations like these and out-wit the Moroks but loses for one of the first times ever (so the Dr is fallible after all! Quite a shock if you’re watching these stories in order), his body frozen for exhibition in a manner that would have killed anyone but a timelord; Barbara tries to be diplomatic and cautious, the way she usually does, but this only ends up with her being separated from the others and gassed (and in a series that uses so many WW2 references this is surely another one); Ian is his usual assertive self times ten in this story, but even his pro-active plotting just lands him in deeper trouble as a sort-of prisoner of war– it’s as if all the old ways that the Tardis crew used to use to get them out of trouble in earlier stories aren’t working anymore. Only Vicki’s method (a very 1960s combination of wide-eyed passion and chaos, with a touch of innocent flirting) seems to work in this new dangerous world, a world that might just be the future for real for the viewers one day. While we never find out which actual decision saved the Tardis crew from being turned into exhibits, most writers seem to agree that it’s probably fifteen-year-old Vicki encouraging the teenagers to rebel that saves them from their colonialists as they are the ones who storm the prison cell the Tardis crew are in after all; it certainly seems fair to say that the writer is firmly on the side of the teenagers. 


Not enough people make enough of that fact in my view because this thought was, for the day, pretty much unheard of. When young people were seen on television in the 1960s it was usually because they were on the news being arrested. Nobody gave them screen time with programmes of their own and they certainly didn’t show people who looked like they did with long hair and hope (at least, not until The Monkees and perhaps Patrick Troughton’s doctor both come along in 1966). They certainly weren’t told to effectively rise up above their adult masters and make their own world as they effectively are in this serial. It is, after all, Vicki doing this – not the grandfatherly Doctor (who certainly seemed to like this sort of thing by his 3rd and 4th incarnations), not even the early-middle-aged Ian or Barbara, but the young audience’s natural identification figure (even if Vicki is technically 500 years younger than any of the audience, she looks and speaks the most like them.
Unfortunately its the one black mark against this otherwise superb story that the production team don’t quite get this right. More by bad luck than mis-judgement, this story full of kiddie revolutionaries happened to be assigned to director Mervyn Pinfield, one of the oldest directors to ever work on the show and more used to being Verity Lambert’s more experienced sounding board as associate producer for the show than a director(the DVD commentary has Maureen so alarmed at how out-of-touch he was that as a group the actors requested not to work with him again). Often in this story decisions are taken that suggest a middle-aged man’s idea of youth from perhaps a decade or so earlier. The Xerons, for instance, are beatniks in black with slightly long hair, straight out of 1955 and no actual real teenager in 1965 would have been seen dead in such a thing (note too that one of the Xerons – the one who seems to have his hands permanently stuck to his hips - is played by Jeremy Bulloch, best known for his role in Cliff Richard film ‘Summer Holiday’, which is also a wholesome 1960s adult idea of what British teenagers got up to that was nothing like the truth even then). By rights, for a story recorded in Spring 1965, the Xerons should be looking like The Byrds, with granny specs and capes (the latest in thing). That’s a shame because this, of all stories, needed to look ‘now’, the point being missed. But its a point that’s still there, in the script. This is still a revolution in waiting, that hasn’t quite arrived yet (trust DW to get there early). And that’s the whole point of this story: ‘DW is a ghost form of what might happen for real in the future a practice run made by people who get to inspire those at homes with ideas of a better world they still have to deliver on. The Space Museum’ is, perhaps, the first time we’ve really seen ‘time’ or ‘the fourth dimension’ as a ‘character’ in Dr Who rather than just something the Tardis travels in, something that’s so crucial to the show today that it turns up more weeks than not (you could make the case for ‘Edge Of Destruction’ I suppose, although it’s really more about the Tardis itself than time as a concept). If ever there was a story that had time as something non-linear and wibbly wobbly, it’s a story where the Tardis jumps a time-track and arrives an episode early, something even Steven Moffat never quite did. Officially, according to the Doctor in the fourth episode, it’s all the fault of a part of the Tardis that got stuck (though the writer’s original concept, a black box that happened to end up in the museum that was taking the Tardis off course, makes much more sense than anything we get on screen).


Are the Tardis crew actually there or not? There is a hint that the Doctor, Ian, Barbara and Vicki are phantoms, people that have arrived at their destination in all ways except for the physical. They are able to walk across land and floors, but at first show no footprints even in the dusty surface of Xeros. They are able to talk to each other but cannot communicate with any outsiders, watching various Xerons walk past talking without being able to hear their speech (this has been put forward as a glitch of the Tardis and its apparent ability to allow the Tardis crew to translate the language of whatever species they encounter, except that they don’t hear the Xerons use any language at all – in fact they sound mute, even though their lips are moving). When Vicki drops a glass of water it regenerates in her hand whole again, as if the event cannot really happen because nothing has physically taken place yet. The brilliant and imaginative hint is that this might be the explanation for spirits and phantoms on Earth, that death is merely to be stuck in this timeless dimension and that all our ghosts are beings who after death have jumped a ‘time track’ and ended up in this world of limbo, able to see the world they used to inhabit but unable to interact with it. Later DW episodes like 2013’s ’Hide’ agree that ghosts live in an entirely separate dimension,with ‘echoes’ that occasionally pass through to the right psychic individuals and might well be this dimension the Dr and co get stuck in. Other episodes that do similar sort of things tend to refer to a timeless fourth dimension as a ‘white void’ (stories like ‘The Mind Robber’ ‘Warrior’s Gate’ or various Sarah Jane Adventures), a literal place of ‘nothing’. However ‘The Space Museum’ is pretty much unique in having the world the Tardis crew end up in running in parallel to the ‘real’ physical world, so much so that it takes half the first episode for them to realise that they aren’t in fact physical beings at all. Such a great idea – and one in 1965, utterly unlike anything else on television. Truly, Glynn Jones never gets enough credit for all the things fans assume Steven Moffat invented forty years later.


Really, though, the idea of what happens to the Tardis crew by the end of ‘The Space Museum’ is deceptively simple; they just had to ‘think outside the box’ (a literal exhibit box in this case) and do something different to what they would normally have done. But what is the right thing? How do you know which of the possible paths is best, which one will lead to salvation and which to doom? For the Tardis crew themselves, the existential threat they experience in this story is one with much wider implications than a brush with monsters. Every move they make, every single one, could get them closer to their deaths or closer towards escape. This isn’t a story the Dr can solve with a swish of the sonic screwdriver (not least because he doesn’t have one yet) – this story is more ambiguous and thoughtful than that. ‘The Space Museum’ is largely unique in terms of Dr Who plots because the end result is something the Tardis crew are trying to avoid, rather than work towards. Barbara talks in the last episode about ‘four separate journeys, four choices that led all the time closer to here’, meaning the prison they are being held in and the exhibition stands that await them for eternity (or at least until a more interesting exhibit comes along and they get thrown away). From episode two to episode four every action the Tardis crew takes could put them further into danger or prove to be their salvation and for once even The Doctor can’t think of what to do to put things right. The big question at the heart of ‘The Space Museum’ is that of predestination and fate. Are our paths set out for us before we are even born, to the point where whole empires (even Dalek ones) have invisible best before dates, or is the future all up for grabs so that quick-thinking and the right action here and there can prevent catastrophe? Was their future guaranteed right up until the point when they interacted with the Moroks and Xerons? Was the Tardis always fated to land on this planet – and is that true of all the adventures the Doctor has ever had?
Or maybe its weirder than that? DW asks a lot in its episodes about possible future and paths not taken (there are whole episodes of this in ‘The Name Of the Doctor’ and ‘Turn Left’). It’s a series that tells us we can be anyone and do anything, our futures hanging in the balance in all the possible presents open to us (with only the past set in stone), although on the other hand there are all of River Song’s episodes lived in the wrong order complete with spoilers. The most interesting comparison though is with ‘The watcher’ phantom in ‘Logopolis’ that knows something about the inevitability of time and fate that even time travellers can’t avoid (after all it was only a year ago ‘The Aztecs’ had the Dr telling us that they couldn’t change history ‘not one line’). Is it the same here? Only this time did the Tardis not like the version of history that was due to happen (the Tardis crew dying) so it decided to intervene and, even if it couldn’t create the future, at least gave its friends a sneak preview so they could have a bash? I’m not so sure the Tardis does develop a ‘fault’ as the Dr says it does in part four: we’re in the early days when he hasn’t stolen it long and doesn’t know how to work it and get it to where its supposed to go, so for the most part he’s content to let the Tardis choose where the Dr needs to be. The universe, after all, would be very different without the doctor in it. There’s a reason whole stars go out in the night sky in this story’s 21st century cousin ‘Turn Left’ (the only other story in the fifty-six year run predominantly concerned with pre-destination and free will, only here it’s more about Donna Noble’s actions than the Doctor’s) after it appears the doctor has died. This leads to some fascinating questions about fate: was the Tardis always meant to land when it finally does? Given what we now know (and knew a little then thanks to ‘Edge Of Destruction’) is the Tardis a semi-sentient entity capable of giving the Tardis crew a fighting chance of escaping a deadly fate? If so, is the Tardis doing this for the crew’s protection or its own? (We do after all see the Tardis in the corner of one of the exhibition rooms; stories like ‘The Doctor’s Wife’ hint that the Tardis is as eager for adventures as The Doctor is and stories like ‘The Name Of The Doctor’ further propose that the Tardis ‘chose’ him to run away with rather than the other way around). Is the Tardis ensuring its own safety by ensuring the crew’s safety? Or is it trying to give the Dr a push into the hero he ends up being, rather than just an explorer by turning him into a moral figure here for pretty much the first time? Had The Tardis landed normally our heroes might possibly have had a quick look around, realised the Moroks weren’t very nice and taken off again very quickly. In their haste to escape becoming exhibits, however, they actually get involved in Xeros’ politics and end up inspiring the Xerons to take control of their planet back. Notably, it’s the first real time that the Doctor and friends could have just run away – unlike earlier stories they are all together until mid-way through the second episode, not trying to escape the Daleks or rescuing Ian from a giant matchbox or rescuing Barbara from whichever evil assassin from history has taken a shine to her this week (the early DW stories being more about the fear of being stranded from home somewhere scary rather than the delight in exploring other worlds and righting wrongs). Maybe the Tardis lands here – in the far far future where the Dr’s interference cant change history too much (we don’t know quite when but only ‘Frontios’ and ‘The Ark’ seem to match it) – to show the Dr how much he can make the universe a better place in other timezones, without causing the ripples he thinks it will, because his intervention is fated. In which case ‘The Space Museum’ might well end up being the most important DW story of them all, the moment when the most crucial thing in the universe isn’t getting home to safety again but being brave and doing the right thing.


One theory is that the Tardis crew themselves don’t actually change anything. They do, after all, act entirely in character even when they’re meant to be changing things, even if in Vicki’s case the anarchic side of her personality is something we hadn’t seen before. Based on adventures before and after it seems inevitable that the first Doctor will end up interrogated by some alien baddie and will try to outwit them; that Ian will be the assertive action-hero looking to save his friends; that Barbara will keep a cool head in trouble and appeal to the locals’ good nature; that Vicki will be brave and impetuous and befriend any quirky-looking local to the planet. And yet all four of them do things that are completely unpredictable for the Moroks and so far out their sphere of knowledge that they can’t quash them the way they can the usual rebellions from local subjugated planets. The Moroks are angered by the Doctor’s antics and his refusal to give them the information they need to the point of killing him (or so they think) – he doesn’t behave in the same cowed way the Xerons do and they don’t quite know what to do with him. This means they get careless and sloppy, less on their guard than usual (particularly after they have ‘frozen’ him and assume he is no longer a threat, not realising that he’s a timelord with a different biology). Ian does what leading men of the past tend to do but the Xerons have forgotten – act aggressive and threaten, even if the audience at home know its mostly an act (mind you, Ian seems unusually keen to get his hands on one of the Moroks’ guns, to the point of risking his life for one). By doing so the Moroks seem genuinely scared and off-guard, clueless after years of looking after the rather aimless and passive Xerons. Barbara, meanwhile, is uncharacteristically old-fashioned in this story, alternating between trying to think and try to hide, more like heroines of the past. She’s rather good at finding hiding places the Moroks can’t discover, even though they’ve lived on this planet for years and she’s a newcomer – once again, its Barbara's imagination, her strongest quality, that ‘saves’ her. Her friendship with Vicki though causes the Xerons to look for her and as Barbara so often does she risks her life to protect a near-stranger almost without question – and the Moroks don’t really understand that concept either.


It is Vicki, though, who clearly does the most to influence her environment, taking action and leading a revolution from the front and giving the locals ideas they’ve never had before (after all, it’s they not Vicki who have the means to re-programme the computer so that it accepts any ‘truthful’ answers rather than merely the ‘right’ ones, they just didn’t have the belief and courage to get there without her help and inspiration). At first it looks as if all their adventures have been in vain (perhaps as the DW’s travels have failed to create a revolution all on their own), the fourth episode finding the Tardis crew back together again and locked up, as close to being in the cabinet cases as they ever come. Their fate sees doomed, perhaps as a direct result of everything they have done (it would have been interesting to know what would have happened if the four had simply ‘done nothing’ as Barbara suggests; this would, after all, have been the single most un-Dr Who thing they could have done). However, like all good Dr Who, the Tardis crew have an impact on the people that they meet on Xeros and it is they who come to their rescue as either a direct or indirect result of what the Tardis crew did and its the Xerons that they’ve inspired who come to their rescue and set them free. It’s a heartwarming ending to a brilliant story, one that asks all the questions of ‘new Who’ about whether the Dr is a good man and episodes like ‘Blink’ ‘Love and Monsters’ and ‘A Good Man Goes To War’ about all the people he touches almost without knowing it and inspired to be better. That, surely, is the DW message right there. Even if this is a very 1960s revolution coming at the end of a very 1960s story, its really timeless in the way that ‘The Space Museum’ makes us want to go out and live up to those ideals, to make the world a better place. We all run the risk of ending up as museum exhibits, stuck in position for the rest of our lives, but we also all have the power to change the futures that have been laid out before us and make things better for all of us. By the time the Tardis leaves Xeros a whole world has been changed for the better and its our world as much as theirs.


A lot of DW is fun escapism, re-creating worlds to get lost in and having interesting characters have exciting adventures on them, but the best stories are something more than that, asking questions about the world we live in and the part we play in it. With its concept of ripples, of cause and effect, of how what we do impacts the people around us, ‘The Space Museum’ is one of those stories. More even than all of that, though, its a really well made bit of television that takes a brilliant complex script and runs with it, doing things that no other TV series was even thinking of making in 1965 as if its the easiest thing in the world and creating 100minutes of high drama that’s as scary and as funny and as downright brilliant as anything else ever made. If I ever end up in a space museum like this, whether as ghost or exhibit frozen in time, a part of me will still be talking about how wonderful, brilliant and life-changing this series is and ‘The Space Museum’ will be my exhibit A when people ask me why. Goodness knows why other fans don’t seem to like it as much as I do: ‘The Space Museum’ is the most DWy DW story of them all, despite telling a tale all of its own, and for me is the single greatest story of the single greatest show in the galaxy, one that’s inspired me like few other works of fiction. Of all the DW stories where the ordinary becomes extraordinary, making a humble dusty museum come alive and making you question your own generation’s place in the corner of some future museum might well be one of the most extraordinary of them all. It made made laugh, it made me cry, it made me scared, it made me angry at the blind authority who try and clamp down on the inevitable to preserve a society even they find boring, it saves the universe in a very 1960s way that gives me hope for the future while being very much a product of the past, that also makes me want to go out and change the present. Now, what other work of art can possibly do all that simultaneously? This is a story that has it all, in a show that breaks the mould of what can be done and asks questions about who we are more than any I can think of. Viva le revolution!


+ For twenty minutes the Tardis crew have been aware that something isn’t quite right but haven’t been able to work out what. Then Vicki reaches out to touch an exhibit and finds her hand going straight through it, realising that the four of them aren’t ‘real’. Even now its quite an effect that takes you by surprise, with the same ‘crossfade to an empty set’ technique as the Tardis, but way ore complex than any effect we’ve seen in the series outside the Dalek stuck down the Thames, because a person’s reacting to it in a very tight locked-off frame where a few inches either way would spell disaster, in a time period where re-takes were all but impossible. All the regulars are stunning in this story but none more so than Maureen O’Brien’s mixture of puzzlement, confusion and awe at this moment, which completely sells something she can’t see and looks totally natural despite the fact she’s having to stick so rigidly to her marks. The 1st Dr’s very 1st Dry put down, that she shouldn’t be touching things anyway, completely missing the bigger picture, is also brilliantly played, with the old William Hartnell burst of anger but with a twinkle in his eye.


- I do wish the Xerons were a little more, well, revolutionary, the way the script wants them to be. It’s one thing for the Moroks to be bored and lifeless – they’re meant to be, aliens that have lived too long and stopped caring. But the Xerons should be full of life and youthful energy, burning with unfocussed passion and enthusiasm. The moment they finally get their freedom back ought to be one of the single most thrilling moments in the series. Instead they stroll around after Vicki nonchalantly, like little lost sheep, their eyebrows perpetually raised as if in surprise (modern viewers thinking of the Xeron’s ‘youngsters’ might be put in mind of the strange things generation Z do to their eyebrows. Or maybe that’s my Morok side turning grumpy because its part of a generation that’s come after mine?)














Monday, 30 October 2023

The Crusade: Ranking - 24

 

The Crusade

(Season 2, Dr 1 with Ian Barbara and Vicki, 27/3/1965-/17/4/1965, producer: Verity Lambert, script editor: Denis Spooner, writer: David Whittaker, director: Douglas Camfield)

Rank: 24

In an emoji: ⚔

   'Ja Nus Hons Pris by Richard the Lionheart - Draft One

No man in prison can tell his tale true 

Not least the adventures of strangers from a box so blue 

That altogether made for such a strange crew 

I brought on them dishonour with ransom due 

In winters past 


They saw through my words, that they were untrue 

I felt remorse for what they had been through 

But what else is a needy King to do? 

There's always a part of the kingdom to woo 

I wonder where they travel to now, in futures to come or history passed?'








There it sits in the Dr Who canon between the one with the unrealistic ants and the one about jumping time tracks, sandwiched by historicals where The Roman Empire becomes a recurring farce and Monks living amongst Ancient Britons and Vikings use electric toasters, a last gasp of realism in a series that’s become increasingly gonzo, only half remembered and indeed only half returned (we only have episodes one and three and we only got the first of those back relatively recently in 1999, when someone bought it at a film fair in New Zealand not knowing it was rare but thankfully found out and sent the BBC a copy – given that officially New Zealand never even bought this story it’s given us all hope that more episodes are out there even in places that aren’t supposed to have them). There it sits in the back catalogue as a last minute bit of ‘old school’ to educate us, just as Dr Who is becoming a series that’s increasingly made purely to entertain. But I put it to you, dear reader, that even in a canon of some of the most exquisitely crafted, multi-textured and grown-up scripts ever written ‘The Crusade’ is special, deep and complex and full of rich dialogue that makes you feel as if you really have stepped back in time to another age. For this is the story where the ants are real and used by evil men on good people and where the time tracks are the difference between the haves and the have-nots, where the only farce is the problems caused between good men who want the same thing deep down and where time is so brutally set in stone our heroes can’t change it however hard they try. This is a world where the people who sit on top of an awkwardly stacked pile of cards that could come crashing down off their throne at any time, one where the only comedy is dripping in bitter irony and the only anachronisms in a tale of man’s inability to ever truly change is the Tardis. 


 This is the third time original script editor David Whittaker wrote for the series and, surprisingly, the only time he got to write one of his beloved historicals (he was a true history buff who loved researching and immersing himself in another world even more than writing and it shows). Whittaker is a class act who always did his homework, whether he was writing about feasible science in the near future or inventing impossible worlds that might exist out in space somewhere, so you can bet he goes the extra mile with material he can actually sit down and learn about. Of all the many great trips into the past Dr Who has taken down the years this is the one that feels the most ‘real’, as if you really have been transported back in time and, good as the serials that centre around the Dr and companions are, there’s something to be said for the historicals that throw the past at them rather than them at the past, so that for the last time the whole plot revolves around not the impact they have on the people they meet but their attempts to get their way back to the Tardis, to the impossible machine that represents home and rescue, in a land so brutal and harsh that you really don’t want to be stuck in for any longer than you have to. What with its tales of Kings marrying off their sisters, misbehaving Arabs and possible blackface or at any rate Caucasian actors in heavy make-up to play people from the Middle East some fans think ‘The Crusade’ is a story best to be left unremembered anyway, a tiny embarrassment from the days when we didn’t know any better and thought our Westernised central idea was ‘right’ to the point of blotting out all other voices (which was how we ended up in the mess of The Crusade in the first place after all). But ‘The Crusade’ is misunderstood precisely because its ‘about’ those things and how different life is now (i.e. in 1965), Whittaker picking up on the crux of other scripts he worked on like ‘The Aztecs’ and ‘The Reign Of Terror’ and asking out loud why people put up with things they knew at the time to be hurtful and deceitful without putting up more of a fight, coming to the conclusion that humans are scared, frail creatures terrified of being seen to do the right thing in case it makes them look weak and who live in a world made up of a tapestry of deceit and lies that means even when they try to do the right thing everyone is so suspicious that they assume they’re up to something. Everyone is a victim in ‘The Crusade’, worried about how they’re perceived, from Richard the Lionheart trying to save his kingdom by showing God is on his side, to Joanna the sister he intends to marry to keep the peace, to Saladin whose just trying to appear strong to his people against the Christian invaders, down to Barbara ending up in a plot to pretend that the King’s right hand man is really him, to the Doctor’s pretence of being a nobleman to steal some clothes to Ian pretending to be a knight to rescue Barbara to Vicki dressing up as a boy. Everyone in this story is trying to be something they’re not and it’s that tapestry of lies and deceit that causes ordinary people to become monsters, as the best means of survival, rather than pure cruelty. The closest to a noble motive the whole story is Muslim ruler Saladin in a move that’s practically blasphemous by 1965 standards, back when King Richard was still treated as almost an English patron saint. As deeply grateful as I am for all returned episodes of missing Dr Who, how I wish it had been episode four not episode one returned most recently, just to prove how modern this story is and how it subverts the slightly uncomfortable subtexts of its opening episodes. 


This is a complex story with no winners only losers, that shifts perspective so that you see it from several sides at once. At first you’re with the noble King Richard The Lionheart as he goes on a daring quest to bring education and knowledge to the barbarian hordes, especially when viewed from the eyes of the soldiers who are so impressed by his words and his valour in battle that they would gladly give their lives in his name (unthinkable in an age when British Royals stand for sleaze, corruption and charging us money for stuff that isn’t truly theirs: just compare how regal Richard is here to shots of Charles having a strop over a leaky pen and you can see where things have gone wrong). But then, the closer the plot gets to the King himself, the more you see this as a good p.r. stunt, that The King is really on a Crusade to make his name and keep his critics quiet as much as anything else, a last ditch attempt to raise funds by a man whose spent too much on the finer things in life that he can’t rule his kingdom (and suddenly the direct line between Royals then and now becomes easier to see). By the time Richard has refused to send help after Barbara and is busy attempting to marry his sister Joanna off for a proxy peace deal without asking her first, you start to see the sham as it really is. Equally while Palestine is painted at first as a dark and evil land, full of cruel and sadistic people who need to learn a bit of that English stiff upper-lip (especially when Barbara is captured by the evil El Akir almost as soon as the Tardis lands, a man whose as close to a pure sadist as any we see in Dr Who until Davros). By the end we see the Middle East of 1191 as a place with a culture and history all of its own, that doesn’t ‘need’ the Christianity and civilisation the soldiers are promising to bring to the ‘infidels’. Before Ian has a chance to rescue her Barbara is rescued in turn by more sympathetic locals who take pity on her plight and who are still trying to seek justice even in a land that’s patently unfair, risking their lives to stop their own ruler even at the cost of their life. 


 ‘We’re’ the invaders in this story, the aliens from outside imposing world domination on another, not ‘them’. Usually Dr Who, at least in these early days finds a historical setting and throws our heroes and heroines at it to see how they cope, but in this one there’s too: the England of the 12th century is portrayed as being just as alien and strange as the East. Basically everything we thought we knew in episode one turns out to be a lie by episode four, but that’s because in this strange medieval world where religion is key and science doesn’t exist yet and everyone’s so jumpy the truth can get you killed. Everyone survives in this story by hiding behind lies: The Doctor can’t let on that he’s a time traveller, Vicki has to pretend to be a boy to be allowed anywhere near court, Ian and Barbara have to be careful who they confide in, Haroun feeds his daughter white lies that the rest of their family is still alive and out there somewhere because without that she would have nothing to live for, Richard has to hide from his people that he’s not really pursuing The Crusade out of noble religious reasons but to hold a shaky poverty-stricken kingdom together, while Saladin hides from his people that he’s not really the brutal murderer they think he is but someone more civilised and understanding (he even sends snow and fresh fruit to Richard, just as he did in real life – and no that’s not an insulting present, fruit and snow were rare and valuable in Europe back then). The only person telling the truth is Joanna – and as a ‘girl’ she has no power whatsoever, despite being a princess, privy to the whims of her brother. Even more than that, though. ‘The Crusade’ points out how typically human and yet unnecessary it all is. Had everyone come clean from the beginning about their motives, had Richard gone to Saladin with trade in mind rather than conquest, had the Dr opened up about who he was to an open minded King, had Ian gone to fight as himself rather than a supposedly rich knight of Jaffa, had Vicki been a girl from the first instead of spooking Chamberlains with dress orders (there’s a great moment, now lost to modern viewers, where he laughs at the idea of sexes dressing as each other and moans about what times they’re living in just like every parent of every hip young trendy thing watching this in 1965) then everyone in this story could have been happy – but they aren’t, because humans are odd little distrustful creatures who don’t seem to be able to stay happy for any length of time.


 Whittaker is clever enough a writer to show that this isn’t just a bleak view of the Middle Ages but a view of humanity in general – and in an era when there were still ‘cold wars’ in Vietnam and Korea it would have struck a lot of viewers the first time round as being familiar (if anything it’s even more spookily familiar today, with two super powers fighting a religious war over Jerusalem). Whittaker’s been writing this story for some time too, threading it into the core of ‘his’ series in his days as the show’s first script editor: this is all pretty close to ‘his’ episode of ‘An Unearthly Child’ about the distrust between the Doctor and future companions when if everyone had been open and honest from the first Ian and Barbara wouldn’t now be so far from home and in constant danger (an episode credited to Anthony Coburn, whose son is causing all the fuss over rights to the first story and its availability on i-player in November, but generally recognised as mostly Whittaker’s work, based on ideas from original Who script editor C E Webber, who didn’t last long enough to see the show on the air, because in those days it was the norm to only credit one writer per story in any BBC series weirdly enough).The Tardis crew have all learned a lot about themselves travelling together and knocking the rough edges off their characters so have become trusting of each other, to the point where when Vicki talks about her worries of being left behind, Maureen O’Brien visibly quaking at the thought of being trapped in this deadly world (she’s always good, far better than she’s given credit for, but especially here where she really makes the most of what little she’s given to do) and the Doctor is shocked – they’re a team now – in this crazy world the only people they can rely on is each other. 


The writer who more than anyone created all four of these people really makes the most of going back to their characters and asking how much their time spent together has changed them, made them stronger by working together – at times faith of being rescued is the only thing that gets Barbara through some pretty horrific ordeals in this story. Whittaker has really taken to the kindlier 1st Doctor he wrote in at the end of ‘The Edge Of Destruction’ when it was clear the series had a future but pushes him further than ever before so that instead of, say, ‘Marco Polo’ where it’s the Dr being unreasonable in a land of nobles, this time he’s the noble in a world of savages, with William Hartnell unbelievably good as he becomes the only person brave enough to rage at the King, seeing through the charades and publicity he’s built up for himself to the scared little boy out of his depth and trying to hang his kingdom together by a thread. Being diplomatic, however, doesn’t come easily to him and the Doctor finds this harder than fighting of an army of Daleks; it’s scenes like this where he loses his temper in the presence of a jumpy King and his loyal soldiers where you sense here just how young he is (yes at the time Whittaker, like every writer on Who, considered the Doctor impossibly old but it’s notable how much it works equally well now that the Doctor has lived so much longer how green around the gills and short-tempered the first Doctor is; that’s why he’s my favourite in fact, because he’s more flawed and less super-timelord than the others). There’s a terrific shown between politicians and soldiers where, for once, the Doctor seems to come off worst (and a great speech about how ’when you men of eloquence have stunned each other with your words we the soldiers have to face it out, while you speakers lay bed our soldiers sort out everything’ something true of every era: I re-write this against the backdrop that posh politicians are talking about conscription and sending working class boys and girls to war against Russia, though of course they’ll never send their own kith and kin). 


 In every previous story you could count on Ian’s British heroics and sheer goodness to put things right, but in this one his moral upstanding makes him easy prey for the people around him who trick and con him with their honeyed words to the point where he finds himself being staked out in the desert and smeared with actual honey, at the mercy of drones who are action heroes like him but without his gained wisdom, just taking orders blindly without thinking (both ants and humans; bet Ian wishes he’d kept a bit of that DN6 back from ‘Planet Of the Giants’). Vicki found the pace of life too slow in ‘The Romans’ and treated it like a giant holiday but she can barely keep up in this story, her 25th century way of thinking even more appalled by the injustices and casual cruelty than her 1960s friends. Barbara has been at the mercy of people in power many a time in this series, be they Aztecs, Roman Emperors, French revolutionaries, Dalek surrogate Nazis, Voords, Sensorites, insecticide pedlars or Giant Ants. You suspect that this is the adventure she remembers late at night most though, shaking from a nightmare long after she’s back safely in 1960s London, as she really goes through it: she isn’t just in the wrong place at the wrong place but kidnapped at knife point, not just leered at in this story but very nearly raped, while standing up to the baddy the way she always does very nearly comes at the cost of her life. Barbara started her time in the Tardis dreaming of changing the past, but all she wants to do now is survive long enough to go back to her own time. It’s quite the journey. 


 The main players all learn valuable lessons too: King Richard can fool everyone but not his sister and her barbs sting in a way no one else’s do, while Joanna learns that while blood is thicker than water a King with a kingdom to rule is thicker even than that, her life turned upside down at the cost of a kingdom that isn’t. Richard gets an early insight into the humility that will see him captured in Austria on his way back from the Crusades, where he becomes a prisoner, spending his time doing what he always should have been doing instead of fighting – writing poetry (Ja Nus Hons Pris’ is his best known, though weirdly a lot better regarded in France than here. I take it back, Royals really are different nowadays, I mean King Charles writing poetry?!) Saladin, too, is the reverse of Richard: The King’s problem is that he has a noble band of men fighting an un-noble war for money that’s only pretending to be about Christianity, whereas Saladin’s a noble man surrounded by thugs trying to keep his goons under control by telling them it’s all for money, when really he’s trying to keep his kingdom together any way he can. He’s also a ‘true’ Muslim in a way that Richard patently isn’t a ‘true’ Christian and is only spouting religious fervour because it’s the best way of making money (he looks positively appalled when his sister claims the Pope has greater rights to loyalty than a King). The only person who learns nothing in this story is the racist sexist thug El Akir, a baddy as mad, bad and dangerous to know as any we see in the series – though even he gets a reason for it with a back-story of being a victim in Whittaker’s brilliant novelisation that shows how he’s angry at all women after being rejected by the love of his life, his brother’s widow and being angry at every female since (in their parlance he’s an infidel – in today’s parlance he’s an incel). Everyone it seems has a personal crusade, a quest to change things and gain new territory that makes them learn about themselves, even if that quest is only survival. And that’s such a good fit for Dr Who as a series where, more often than not, we see the effects that people’s actions have on the people around them and the ripples across past, present and future that every action takes and why we should do the right thing by people where we can because of that (one of the few constant themes across the show’s sixty years) Dr Who was unusual from the first in being a series where people did grow from story to story, where the adventures they had weren’t interchangeable and where you couldn’t just drop in and out in any order the way you could most dramas and soap operas but under Whittaker’s guiding hand especially this becomes exactly the series Sydney Newman created it to be: a drama where people learn things, not just about the environments they land in but about themselves. 


 Of course you can write all the glorious words you want and it won’t mean a thing if the cast can’t deliver them properly, but the brilliance of ‘The Crusade’s dialogue is matched by the brilliance of its cast. Julian Glover is an excellent King, a renowned stage actor even back then when he was just thirty, risked his reputation by doing Dr Who back in the days when it wasn’t the cultural phenomenon it is now and dismissed by many for being merely a ‘children’s show’. He did this story on the back of the script, which he rightly recognised as being on a par with any of the big revered history plays he was in at the time, with Richard arguably richer and more complex in this story than he is in any of the actual books and plays directly about him (including ‘Age of Kings’ a 1961 drama with the same director as this story Douglas Camfield in which Julian Glover played, umm, Richard the Lionheart and ‘Ivanhoe’ a 1982 drama directed by Douglas Camfield in which Julian Glover, err, played Richard The Lionheart, despite the actor not having more than a passing resemblance to the paintings of him; not to mention the most famous interpretation ‘The Lion In Winter’ and works by Vidal Gore and Tariq Ali; naturally Richard The Lionheart is an actual lion in the Disney universe when he turns up in ‘Robin Hood’). Incidentally, when Glover returns in Dr Who in ‘The City Of Death’ he plays the last of the Jagaroth, an alien race whose been splintered and sent back across twelve different stages of history, which involved the actor briefly dressing up in lots of different costumes from different time periods – one of which is a Crusade uniform. Could it be that the King himself is an alien?!) Jean Marsh wasn’t yet as well known (though she had been in excellent Twilight Zone episode ‘The Lonely’ before this) but you can already tell that she will be, the first of her three Dr Who appearances in many ways her best as she makes Joanna simultaneously soft and warm, harsh and tender, haughty and common, caught between a life as the revered sister of the most important man in the land and the little sister who can still be put to the sword if she angers her Royal brother too much. It’s a brilliant portrayal – I yearn for more of this story to be found if only because of all the rich acting that’s going on in Jean Marsh’s eyes in the episodes we do have, when the camera’s meant to be looking at someone else and which you can’t see in photographs or from a soundtrack even if you squint. Bernard Kay too is excellent as Saladin, peeling the layers of a complex character away one by one, while George Little superb in the little he gets to do as Haroun, a man of honour in a world that doesn’t often let him use it (again the novel gives him more back story for his motivation: revenge against the leader who gave the orders to set his house alight and murder his wife in cold blood, something only vaguely hinted at here). By contrast Walter Randall has a whole different job as El Akir, being one-note nasty and a threat around which the whole story turns, but he’s excellent too, a rare person in Dr Who with no redeeming features whatsoever who still feels ‘real’ rather than a caricature. Mostly, though, everyone’s a scoundrel in one way or another or at best dishonest for no worse motive than trying to stay alive. 


 Yes to modern eyes its a shame that they give the three decent Arab parts to Europeans (though if anything Who is going against the grain for TV traditions of the time in having genuine Arab actors at all and not just in this story – this is the middle of three times Tutte Lemkow is there, an actor whose become very popular with fans on the back of his three appearances in the show, though you might not recognise him without the pet monkey or the one-eye of Cyclops of ‘Marco Polo’ and ‘The Myth Makers’; the poor chap cut himself badly at rehearsals, sticking the knife he threatens ian with in his own finger down to the bone, resulting in a trip to hospital and a Tetanus jab, but he gamely turned up without missing a rehearsal). Forget what some of the Dr Who textbooks tell you though: this isn’t a story that’s clumsy about the racial issues at all but one that’s very much aware of the complexity of this period of history in this part of the world and how people of the 20th century view it through different eyes. Compare it to almost any other 1960s TV about the Arab world and what impresses you most is just how fair this is, right down to the actors speaking proper BBC English rather than silly voices. 


One of the best things about ‘The Crusade’ is that it doesn’t feel like it’s ‘just’ a stop off back in a time that couldn’t possibly exist again and needs to be imagined – it feels like another part of an ongoing tapestry that exists to this day, another stalemate in an ongoing battle between ‘locals’ and ‘invaders’ that can never be won. The cleverness of ‘The Crusade’ is that feels like another chapter in part of an ongoing story about man’s inhumanity to men that don’t look like he does, part of a long lesson in learning that we might learn one day but probably won’t. It feels like a long time ago this story and in other ways no time at all – it’s quite eerie to be reviewing a story about how peace in Palestine feels impossible during a month when the ongoing wars in the middle East, which have ebbed and flowed going back to the 12th century, have flared up into massacre-levels again, with a similar tapestry of lies and propaganda and skirmishes and betrayals setting the tone for our current battle. Spookily both stories are about an invasion of Jerusalem, although Richard never quite gets there on screen (or in real life: the Doctor fudges his soothsaying for the King but though Richard sees the Holy Land he knows he doesn’t have enough troops to capture it so turns back). We’ve been here before so many many times because humanity never ever learns: chances are David Whittaker, writing in 1965, had the Suez crisis of nine years earlier at the back of his mind when he wrote this story (an Egyptian blockade of Israel) or maybe even the 1950 ‘Law Of Return’ that saw the English promise a ‘safe return’ of Jews to their homeland they couldn’t possibly make good (much like the ‘Crusade’ itself its ‘our’ fault for meddling in things bigger than us, however much the history books tries to paint us as trying to spread civilisation to a backward land to make people’s lives better, which is what most British viewers were being told at the time). You can absolutely draw a line between the fake-peace of this story in the 11th century, secured by marrying off a princess who doesn’t want to go to a man who doesn’t care for her, in a war fought for money but hidden behind religious banners, and today when war overturns ceasefires that overturns wars, depending on the people in power and splinter terrorist groups at any one time, in an ongoing stalemate that neither side can win. 


 Even if you don’t see that then, like other Dr Who historicals in the 1960s, the past is still brought brilliantly to life, perhaps more so than any other example (which is really saying something this decade’s trips to the past are all so accurate and detailed) not just with costumes and make-up and props as normal (the BBC often did plays set in this time period in the 1960s so had a lot of stock ready made to hand – perhaps another reason this time period got chosen in the first place) but with the rich dialogue. While The Romans and Vikings and Aztecs still talk much like 1960s people with the slang turned down and some old-fashioned words sprinkled throughout, Whittaker writes this story as it would have been heard in the day, rich in iambic pentameter and blank verse and with practically everyone saying something quotable most of the time (So many of my favourite lines are from this story: ‘All wise men look for peace. The terms of peace make wise men look fools’ ‘Give him every liberty – except liberty itself’ ‘You must serve my purpose – or you have no purpose’, ‘Hold one hand out in friendship, but keep the other on your sword’ ‘The brave deserve their favours ‘The only pleasure left for you is death – and death is very far away’ and a line I use all the time ‘You ask for the impossible very lightly’, something I’d forgotten even came from Dr Who until re-watching this story again). The dialogue is especially rich when the Tardis quartet aren’t around and we’re dropping in on the people here in their ‘natural habitat’ – the full on argument between Richard and Joanna in episode three, a brother and sister squabble heightened by the fact he’s King of England and she resents having to obey her sibling even though she has to, is particularly rich with insults and language. No wonder ‘The Crusade’ was one of the first three Who stories selected to be turned into novelisations soon after it was on the air (alongside ‘The Daleks’ and ‘The Web Planet’), novelised by Whittaker himself: at the time, far more so than now, ‘The Crusade’ was being held up as being a particularly sophisticated entry in a series that was always far more educational and classy that it had any need to be. The novel is in fact where I first fell in love with this story, long before I could see the remaining half or listen to the soundtrack taped off the TV onto a reel-to-reel and decades later made available to buy on a shiny CD by a combination of science and magic (I’ve read how ‘cleaning’ processes and compact disc mastering works enough times in my ‘day job’ as a music reviewer, but I defy anyone to not see a little bit of Dr Who like magic in how something taped in murky audio sixty years ago can be cleaned up to sound better than a lot of things being made now). The original TV version didn’t disappoint when I saw it though: everyone is going the extra mile in this story and everyone means every last worthy word they say, from the main parts to the regulars to the extras. 


 The accuracy too is first class. Richard isn’t the patron saint of other dramas or the butcher with an axe to grind, or a gullible fool, or a religious zealot as so many lesser dramas do, but a more complex man, who knows what he does is probably doomed but does it anyway as it’s a better alternative than poverty or all-out war. They could have made him a noble explorer like ‘Marco Polo’ or a comedy twit like Nero but he’s neither: he’s a man trying to be the King his people need. Richard’s not a glorious lion-hearted ruler here but a newly installed cub, two years into his reign, watching his kingdom unravel but doing his best to keep it from the people around him. Admittedly in real life Joanna was meant to be married off six weeks after the fake-Richard got captured rather than more or less simultaneously, but that bit of artistic license aside every single bit of this story is true and there are plenty of spaces where the Doctor and friends’ adventures can fit. Whittaker even correctly guesses at the incestuous relationship between Richard and Joanna, of which more has come to light since this story went out. Although this element got toned down (reportedly because William Hartnell was outraged: in his childhood Richard would have been painted as even more of a folk hero as much as anything else, though I shouldn’t think producer verity Lambert was too happy at having such an idea go out under her watch either) Glover and Marsh still pitch their performance as something more than siblings if slightly less than full on lovers, something they found fairly easy to do given that Glover was in fact married to Marsh’s best friend actress Eileen Atkins at the time (and a rare name you think must have been in Dr Who at some point but never has). Even so Lambert left them notes after the producer’s run – which they seem to have ignored given episode three – that read ‘don’t think I don’t know what you’re up to!’ Jean also knew Hartnell having started her career in the 1953 film ‘Will Any gentlemen?’ in which he starred (though both are upstaged by newcomer Jon Pertwee! It’s where he and Jean first met and the pair married not longer, though had divorced by the time Pertwee became the Doctor. So as you see very incestuous all round!) 


The result is a story that feels a class above anything else on offer, even in what I consider Dr Who’s most golden patch, a smart story by a smart writer that doesn’t ever talk down to its audience or make the kind of sacrifices for TV viewing that other Dr Who stories do, in all eras. Like the best writers of history you can tell both that Whittaker adores this place but also that he’s done enough research to know that in reality he’d hate to live there. This isn’t a sanitised version of past at all: Barbara in real danger, at one point handed a knife by Haroun and told to kill herself and his daughter if soldiers get near otherwise expect a fate worse than death: you feel it too. The attention to detail is extraordinary, from the script to the costumes (al proper period) and down to the sound (there’s an extra echo added to the scenes in the Arab world, to better reflect being inside temples rather than being outside). Even the livestock: Camfield hired actual ants from London Zoo from the scenes where Ian’s arm gets daubed in honey (something William Russell, understandably, refused to do so that’s production assistant Viktors Ritelis’ arm you seen on screen…well, telesnap photo) not to mention a live animal carcass (which reportedly made the studio stink to high heaven) and a real life falcon – Richard’s favourite pet. If there’s a downside it’s nothing that can’t be explained by time or budget: this story doesn’t look as lush as the earlier historicals (though I’ll gladly take that back if episodes 2 and 4 are returned and prove me wrong!) and while the script mentions battles –aplenty most of what we get on screen is the talking, bar a very lowkey skirmish at the very start and a swordfight at the end. The whole is almost unrelentingly grim: only ‘Genesis Of The Daleks’ and ‘Caves Of Androzani’ cut this one close to just how dark a vision of the world it is; much as I admire that, much as its better than just making the past out as fun and games, I do prefer my Dr Who stories to come with just a dash of hope. Especially from Whittaker who usually excels at happy endings: this one just ends with a cowed Tardis crew being grateful they escaped with their lives and a cut shot of Richard finally praying to the God he claims to serve, even though we at home know his Crusade is doomed. This isn’t just gratuitous misery though: Whittaker uses this story to explore a lot about the misery of being human in any era and how misunderstandings can quickly grow and spread and above all other things this story is a tragedy with a capital T, a world of people with clashing convictions equally convinced they’re right rather than heroes and villains. Which is exactly the sort of story Dr Who should be telling and one I wish they’d tell more. ‘The Crusade’ remains above all else a real high point of the ‘intellectual’ side of Dr Who’s ever elastic catalogue, a story that’s rich in words and costumes and ideas, even if the starting point is a King whose really very poor indeed. 


 POSITIVES + Even in the middle of one of the grimmest, most serious Dr Who stories of them all there’s a prime comedy moment where the Doctor outwits a hapless merchant whose on the take, pretending to be of high standing and what you might call an ‘influencer’ today, someone sure to tell everyone he meets about this wonderful market stall. Both men think they’ve got the better of the other (he’s a crook whose stolen these clothes in the first place) but there can only be one winner and William Hartnell’s sheer delight at his own ruse as he tries not to get the giggles and give the game away is TV magic. 


 NEGATIVES - There is, however, one element that’s maybe not quite as great as in other Dr Who historicals: the sets. Barry Newbury is stretched by other jobs so we just don’t get the same level of care and attention to detail we usually had under his watchful eye. The ‘forest ambush’ in the opening episode is particularly poor, being basically a cluster of droopy fake looking trees gathered together on what’s clearly a studio floor (shot in Ealing, not Lime Grove or TV centre, to afford bigger space in a sign of how regarded this series was now at the BBC– which they then don’t seem to use. Most odd. That, incidentally, is probably why we don’t get one of Whittaker’s beloved Tardis chat scenes the way we do in at least his original draft of every other story he wrote or re-wrote, which is a real shame: more than anyone he viewed these stories as about how the characters reacted to events, not the events themselves). And this eighteen months after they successfully brought an alien petrified jungle to life in ‘The Daleks’! Thankfully the sets get better as the story goes on (the harem and castle look particularly good) but still without ever reaching the luxurious heights of ‘Marco Polo’ or ‘The Aztecs’. 


 BEST QUOTE: Joanna on the Doctor: ‘There is something new in you yet older than the sky itself’, which is as good a description of Doctor as we ever hear in any story. 


Previous ‘The Web Planet’ next ‘The Space Museum’

Wish World/The Reality War - Ranking n/a (but #295ish)

  "Wish World/The Reality War” (15 th Dr, 2025) ( Series 15/2A serial 7, Dr 15 with Belinda, 24-31/5/2025, showrunner: Russell T D...